To make matters worse, parents of children with cancer are required by law to subject their kids to the entire battery of 'conventional treatment options' before they are allowed to seek alternative paths, and then only when the medical establishment has declared their child unable to withstand further treatment, a situation which usually involves the child being reduced to a virtual vegetable, bloated, hairless, riddled with secondary cancers, liver disease, and a whole host of other horrifying conditions including bone malformation and brain damage. The film follows the story of the Navarro family, who fight to the point of congressional hearings for the right to treat their 4-year old son at an alternative treatment facility in Texas. This facility, established by Polish Doctor Stanislaw Burzynski, has been treating patients with a non-toxic, non-patented amino-acid drip with enormous success, but the FDA had already barred the way to his door for the Navarros by reducing his clinic access to end-case patients only. The fate of this clinic is an interesting sub-plot in itself. In its determination to defend pharmaceutical companies' rights to dominate treatment options, the FDA waged a 13-year, $8 million legal battle to indict Burzynski on any and all charges available to the legal imagination, 75 counts in all, but were forced to merely sideline his clinic after prosecution failed on all counts to eliminate him from the game entirely. The fate of Dr. Burzynski, of other alternative-treatment practitioners, and of innovative scientists and research teams who have for decades now been thwarted and smeared as quacks by the ACS, not to mention the fate of patients like Tommy Navarro and tens of thousands like him, makes for a very sobering, sometimes infuriating, sinister and heartbreaking film, but it is an object lesson in how our country works and how, moreover, our own possible health trajectories might play out. I should add that the film is expertly produced, narrated, and formally balanced, not at all in the manner of some of Michael Moore's more strident if admirable efforts. It is an example of what great documentary filmmaking is all about. See this film. Playing 10/8 and 10/10 at the Smith Rafael Theatre in San Rafael. Jim Navarro's ongoing struggle for our right to alternative treatment options can be explored at http://www.cancerbusters.us/
Monday, September 27, 2010
MVFF33: 'Cut Poison Burn'
According to Nobel laureate and co-discoverer of DNA Dr. James Watson "the National Cancer Program is a bunch of shit", and this important film tells why. Wayne Chesler's Cut Poison Burn documents the ways in which pharmaceutical companies, and their creature, the American Cancer Society, in league with the American Medical Association and the FDA, govern the state of cancer treatment and research in this country by absolute decree, rewarding political candidates and CEOs and failing, to a staggering extent, the actual victims of this dread disease, their families, and the many brilliant independent research associates who struggle in vain to advance a real cure. Audiences will be interested to learn that a patient's life expectancy in 2010 has not, except in the case of 4 known cancers, increased at all since the 1920s when cancer research began in earnest; that patients today experience far greater suffering and diminishment in quality of life; that apparently benign fronts in the 'battle' such as Breat Cancer Awareness Month are PR fronts for purveyors of lethal drugs like Tamoxifin, known to cause uterine cancer in women; that research teams in universities across the country are routinely denied development grants for promising breakthroughs in non- or less toxic treatment options and are effectively squeezed out of the field anyway by FDA stipulations that new treatments be subjected to a staggering $1.6 billion of industry testing in order to qualify for approval. Since pharmaceutical companies (which constitute, incidentally, the largest lobbying sector in Washington bar none) are the only organizations capable of supplying such sums they have the entire industry of cancer research and treatment in a state of lockdown.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Saw this film last nite. Marvelous, difficult and important. A must see.
ReplyDeleteThis was a riveting film about a horrible disease and how we can't get out of our own way to fight it. It was masterfully done.
ReplyDeleteIncredible film, one of the most profound I have ever seen.
ReplyDeleteAlthough some proponents of antineoplaston therapy have suggested that the reviews of this treatment by conventional cancer specialists are biased by mistrust of alternative therapies, even some prominent figures in the field of alternative medicine have reservations about antineoplastons. According to Dr. Andrew Weil, "Over the years, Dr. Burzynski claims to have treated more than 8,000 patients, but his success rates are unknown. His Web site states only that he has helped 'many' people. If antineoplaston therapy works, we should have scientific studies showing what percentage of patients treated have survived and for how long, as well as evidence showing how Dr. Burzynski's method stacks up against conventional cancer treatment…. Until we have credible scientific evidence showing what antineoplastons are, how they act in the body, and what realistic expectations of treatment with them might be, I see no reason for any cancer patient to take this route."
ReplyDeleteDr. Weil is wrong. It's a pity he did not inform himself better, before making the above pronouncement. If anyone has fought to prove his methods and his cases objectively, it's Burzynski.
ReplyDeleteIf you want to know the facts, and see just how the FDA operates (which is truly amazing and upsetting), watch "Burzynski, the movie." An important document.